Combined Effect of Deterministic and Stochastic Variables on Comparative Performance Analysis of 110 kW A-Si PV and C-Si PV based Rooftop Grid Tied Solar Photovoltaic Systems in Jodhpur

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.sidebar##

Published Jun 4, 2013
Download
PDF
Statistic

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

Metrics

Metrics Loading ...
Volume 9, issue 2, June 2013

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Vikas Pratap Singh
Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur, Old Residency Road, Jodhpur - 342 011, Rajathan
Vivek Vijay
Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur, Old Residency Road, Jodhpur - 342 011, Rajathan
B. Ravindra
Indian Institute of Technology Jodhpur, Old Residency Road, Jodhpur - 342 011, Rajathan
D. K. Chaturvedi
Dayalbagh Educational Institute, Dayalbagh, Agra – 282005, Uttar Predesh
Rajashekhar P. Mandi
Central Power Research Institute, Bangalore - 560 080

Abstract

The main objective of this paper is to review the state of the art of IIT Jodhpur Rooftop installed 110 kW PV systems. This is done analyzing the operational data of 110 kW PV systems (43.30 kW located in Block 1 and 58.08 kW in Block 2). Performance analysis depends on three basic term of solar PV. How much energy do they produce? What level of performance is associated to their production? Which are the key parameters that most influence their quality? During the year 2011, the PV systems in Jodhpur, India have produced a mean annual energy of 1290.64 kWh/kWp in block-1 and 1290.64 kWh/kWp in Block-2. As a whole, the location of Solar PV system is the main reason of energy variability and system output. The overall mean Performance Ratio is 75% in both Blocks. Solar power variability depends on the two variables, deterministic and stochastic variable. In last few years researcher work on finding deterministic variable such as system losses (module efficiency, DC cable losses, inverter losses and AC cable losses) but these deterministic variables are not enough to give accurate forecasting so with the help of combined effect of these both variable give accurate plant performance and reliable solar power forecasting for solar power scheduling and dispatchability.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Singh, V. P., Vijay, V., Ravindra, B., Chaturvedi, D. K., & Mandi, R. P. (2013). Combined Effect of Deterministic and Stochastic Variables on Comparative Performance Analysis of 110 kW A-Si PV and C-Si PV based Rooftop Grid Tied Solar Photovoltaic Systems in Jodhpur. Power Research - A Journal of CPRI, 279–290. Retrieved from https://cprijournal.in/index.php/pr/article/view/898

References

  1. Renewable Energy Smalley, MRS Bull 30, pp. 412, 2005.
  2. Weisz P B. Phys. Today, Vol. 57, No. 47, 2004.
  3. Keeling C D, Whorf T P and Wahlen M. Journal of Vanderplicht, Nature, Vol. 375, No. 666, 1995.
  4. Mann M E, Bradley R S, Hughes M K. P.D. Jones, Science, Vol. 280, pp. 2029, 1998.
  5. DOE Argonne National Laboratory. Basic research needs for the Hydrogen economy; Report of DOE BES Workshop on Hydrogen Production, Storage and use, pp. 1315, May 2003.
  6. Crabtree G W and Lewis N S. Phys. Today, Vol. 60, No. 37, 2007.
  7. Gratzel M. Inorg. Chem. Vol. 44, pp. 6841, 2005.
  8. Sims R E H. MRS Bull. Vol. 33, pp. 389, 2008.
  9. Osborne M. http://www.pvtech.org/news/a/ worldwide. Photovoltaic installations grew installations grew 110 in 2008 says solar buzz, March 2009.
  10. Osborne M. http://www.pvtech.org/news/a/ gartner posts long-range forecast for photovoltaic industry, March 2009.
  11. Yoo S, Lee E and Lee K. “Building integrated photovoltaics”: A Korean case study. Solar Energy, Vol. 64, pp. 151–61, 1998.
  12. Oliver M, Jackson T. “Energy and economic evaluation of building integrated photovoltaic”. Energy, Vol. 26, pp. 431–439, 2001.
  13. Kiss G, Kinkead J. “Building integrated photovoltaics”: A Case study. In Proceedings of the IEEE First World Conference on Photovoltaic Energy.
  14. Barra O A La. “Conversione fototermica dell’energia solare—orogettazione ricerca di impianti e sistemi solari”. ETAS libri, 1981.
  15. “Energy yield and performance ratio of photovoltaic systems”: On http://www.greenrhinoenergy.com/solar/technologies/ pv_energy_yield.php.
  16. Kymakis E, Kalykakis S and Papazoglou T M. “Performance analysis of a grid connected photovoltaic park on the island of Crete”. Energy Convers Manage, Vol. 50, No. 3, pp. 433–438, 2009.
  17. Photovoltaic Power Systems Programme, Cost and performance trends in grid connected photovoltaic systems and case studies. IEA-PVPS T2-06:2007.
  18. Mondol J D. et al. “Long term performance analysis of a grid connected photovoltaic system”: In Northern Ireland. Energy Convers Manage, Vol. 47, No. 18–19, pp. 2925–2947, 2006.
  19. Blaesser G. “PV system measurements and monitoring the European experience”. Sol Energy Mater Sol Cells, Vol. 47, No. 1–4, pp. 167–176, 1997.
  20. Decker B, Jahn U. “Performance of 170 grid connected PV plants in Northern Germany”; Analysis of yields and optimization potentials. Solar Energy, Vol. 59, No. 4–6, pp. 127–33.

Most read articles by the same author(s)

1 2 > >>