A Comparison of PI Tuning by Direct Search and Genetic Algorithm for Optimal Control of AGC in Continuous-Discrete Mode

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

Debashisha Jena
Mokenapalli Vijay

Abstract

This paper deals with Automatic generation control (AGC) of interconnected hydrothermal system in continuous-discrete mode using proportional-integral (PI) controller with different tuning approaches. Here the PI controller is initially tuned using local optimization technique such as Fminsearch (Existing MATLAB function) and optimal control strategies were taken as integral square error (ISE), integral time-absolute error (IATE) and integral time square error (ISTE). Then the same PI controller is tuned by using evolutionary algorithm i.e. Genetic Algorithm (GA). For the given system appropriate generation rate constraint (GRC) has been considered both for the thermal and hydro plants. System performances are examined considering 1 % Step Load Perturbation (SLP) in both thermal and hydro area with 1 second sampling period. Finally the performance of both the local and global optimization algorithms is compared in terms of the time domain specifi cations both for frequency deviation in each area, and tie line power.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Jena, D., & Vijay, M. (2012). A Comparison of PI Tuning by Direct Search and Genetic Algorithm for Optimal Control of AGC in Continuous-Discrete Mode. Power Research - A Journal of CPRI, 113–122. Retrieved from https://cprijournal.in/index.php/pr/article/view/374

References

  1. Kothari D P, and Nagrath I J, “Modern Power System Analysis”, 3rd ed, New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill, 2003.
  2. Elgerd O I, “Electric Energy Systems Theory: An Introduction”, 2nd ed. New Delhi: Tata McGraw-Hill, 1983.
  3. Hari L, Kothari M L, and Nanda J. “Optimum Selection Speed Regulation Parameters for Automatic Generation Control in Discrete Mode Considering Generation Rate Constraints, IEE Proc C., Vol. 138, No. 5, pp. 401–6, 1991.
  4. Nanda J and Kaul B L. “Automatic Generation Control of an Interconnected Power System”, IEE, Proc., Vol. 125, No. 5, pp. 385–390, 1978.
  5. Concordia C and Kirchamayer L K. Tie-line Power and Frequency Control of Electric Power System, part II”, AISE Trans, III-A., Vol. 73, pp. 133–146, Apr. 1954.
  6. Kirchamayer L K. “Economic Control of Interconnected Systems”, New York: Wiley, 1959.
  7. Ramey D G and Skooglund J W. “Detailed Hydro Governor Representation for System Stability Studies”, IEEE, Trans. Power App. Syst., Vol. 89, No. 1, pp.106–112, Jan 1970.
  8. Nanda J, Ashish Mangla, and Sanjay suri, “Some New Findings on Automatic Generation Control of Interconnected Hydrothermal System with Conventional Controllers”, IEEE, Trans, Power App. Syst., Vol. 21, 2006.
  9. Kothari M L, Satsangi P S and Nanda J, “Sampled-data Automatic Generation Control of an Interconnected Reheat Thermal System Considering Generation Constraints”, IEEE, Trans PAS, Vol. 100, 1981.
  10. Bohn E V and Minnissy S M. “Optimum Load-Frequency Sampled-Data control with Randomly Varying System and Disturbances”, IEEE, Trans PAS, Vol. 91, pp. 2095–2103, 1972.
  11. Nagrath I J, and Gopal M. “Control Systems Engineering”, 2nd ed, Delhi, Wiley, 1981.
  12. Lagarias J C, Reeds J A, Wright M H and Wright P E, “Convergence Properties of the Nelder-Mead simplex method in low dimensions”, SIAM Journal of Optimization, Vol. 9, pp. 112–147, November 1 1988.
  13. Ramakrishna K S S and Bhatti T S. “Load Frequency Control of an Interconnected Hydrothermal Power Systems”, ICEE, 2006.
  14. Elgerd O I and Fosha C E. “Optimum Megawatt-Frequency Control of Multi Area Electric Energy Systems”, IEEE, Trans. PAS, Vol. 89, No. 4, pp. 556–563, April 1970.