Experimental implementation of 100 W Photovoltaic Panel with DC-DC Boost Converter for Maximum Power Point Tracking

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.main##

M. Hareesh
C. Amarnath
G. Siva Kumar
D. Sreenivasarao

Abstract

The performance of a photovoltaic (PV) module is affected by irradiance and temperature. Often, it is also affected by partially or completely shaded conditions by passing clouds. This paper presents a MATLAB/SimulinkTM based model to study the I–V and P–V characteristics of a PV panel under partially shaded and non-shaded conditions. And also, Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT) of PV module by DC-DC boost converter is explained. The design of boost converter parameters and its affect on power tracking of the PV module are explained. The perturbation and observation (P&O) method is implemented for maximum power extracting from PV panel, because of its easy implementation. The P&O algorithm tune the dc-dc boost converter duty cycle to ensure that PV system operates at MPPT. A 100 W Photovoltaic (PV) panel with dc-dc boost converter is implemented practically for experimental validation. This work is extended for tracking of MPPT during shading conditions also. The P and O algorithm is implemented in DSpace, in which the output power of PV panel compared for every sampled time by varying the duty cycle in small steps.

##plugins.themes.academic_pro.article.details##

How to Cite
Hareesh, M., Amarnath, C., Siva Kumar, G., & Sreenivasarao, D. (2016). Experimental implementation of 100 W Photovoltaic Panel with DC-DC Boost Converter for Maximum Power Point Tracking. Power Research - A Journal of CPRI, 797–805. Retrieved from https://cprijournal.in/index.php/pr/article/view/172

References

  1. M. A. Eltawil and Z. Zhao, “MPPT techniques for photovoltaic applications,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., Vol. 25, pp. 793–813, 2013.
  2. J. M. Enrique, E. Duran, M. Sidrach-de-Cardona, and J. M. Andujar, “Theoretical assessment of the maximum power point tracking efficiency of photovoltaic facilities with different converter topologies,” Sol. Energy, Vol. 81, No. 1, pp. 31–38, 2007.
  3. T. Esram and P. L. Chapman, “Comparison of photovoltaic array maximum power point tracking techniques,” IEEE Trans. Energy Convers. EC, Vol. 22, No. 2, p. 439, 2007.
  4. R. Faranda and S. Leva, “Energy comparison of MPPT techniques for PV Systems,” WSEAS Trans. power Syst., Vol. 3, No. 6, pp. 446–455, 2008.
  5. E. Koutroulis, K. Kalaitzakis, and N. C. Voulgaris, “Development of a microcontroller-based, photovoltaic maximum power point tracking control system,” IEEE Trans. power Electron., Vol. 16, No. 1, pp. 46–54, 2001.
  6. T. J. Liang, Y. C. Kuo, and J. F. Chen, “Single-stage photovoltaic energy conversion system,” IEE Proceedings - Electric Power Applications, Vol. 148, No. 4. pp. 339–344, 2001.
  7. J. J. Nedumgatt, K. B. Jayakrishnan, S. Umashankar, D. Vijayakumar, and D. P. Kothari, “Perturb and observe MPPT algorithm for solar PV systems-modeling and simulation,” in 2011 Annual IEEE India Conference, pp. 1–6, 2011.
  8. H. Patel and V. Agarwal, “MATLAB-based modeling to study the effects of partial shading on PV array characteristics,” IEEE Trans. energy Convers., Vol. 23, no. 1, pp. 302–310, 2008.
  9. A. Reza Reisi, M. Hassan Moradi, and S. Jamasb, “Classification and comparison of maximum power point tracking techniques for photovoltaic system: A review,” Renew. Sustain. Energy Rev., Vol. 19, pp. 433–443, Mar. 2013.
  10. B. Subudhi and R. Pradhan, “A comparative study on maximum power point tracking techniques for photovoltaic power systems,” IEEE Trans. Sustain. Energy, Vol. 4, No. 1, pp. 89–98, 2013.